Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #2305, comment 34
- Timestamp:
- Feb 9, 2017, 5:46:26 PM (7 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #2305, comment 34
initial v1 5 5 We tested it with Sestroretsk1714 (lobby nickname) and it works for his 3G modem-based connection. 6 6 7 To my surprise, my own primary connection is routed through a provider's symmetric NAT now (at least 3 months ago my router received a public IP and [[http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/zesty/man1/stun.1.html|stun test utility]] reported 'Port Restricted Cone' NAT (my own router); now router receives LAN IP and the utility says that there is a symmetric NAT on the route), so neither the current implementation of NAT traversal nor port forwarding does n'twork with this connection anymore.7 To my surprise, my own primary connection is routed through a provider's symmetric NAT now (at least 3 months ago my router received a public IP and [[http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/zesty/man1/stun.1.html|stun test utility]] reported 'Port Restricted Cone' NAT (my own router); now router receives LAN IP and the utility says that there is a symmetric NAT on the route), so neither the current implementation of NAT traversal nor port forwarding does work with this connection anymore. 8 8 9 9 Currently the code doesn't build on Windows, but it should be easily fixable by including the proper headers. Also non-primary connection modes (direct connection, STUN enabled host with non-STUN client and vice versa etc.) may have some easily noticeable/fixable bugs. And the code still requires some style fixes (in particular part of those reported by elexis in comment:25)