Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #2305, comment 34


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 9, 2017, 5:46:26 PM (7 years ago)
Author:
fcxSanya

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #2305, comment 34

    initial v1  
    55We tested it with Sestroretsk1714 (lobby nickname) and it works for his 3G modem-based connection.
    66
    7 To my surprise, my own primary connection is routed through a provider's symmetric NAT now (at least 3 months ago my router received a public IP and [[http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/zesty/man1/stun.1.html|stun test utility]] reported 'Port Restricted Cone' NAT (my own router); now router receives LAN IP and the utility says that there is a symmetric NAT on the route), so neither the current implementation of NAT traversal nor port forwarding doesn't work with this connection anymore.
     7To my surprise, my own primary connection is routed through a provider's symmetric NAT now (at least 3 months ago my router received a public IP and [[http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/zesty/man1/stun.1.html|stun test utility]] reported 'Port Restricted Cone' NAT (my own router); now router receives LAN IP and the utility says that there is a symmetric NAT on the route), so neither the current implementation of NAT traversal nor port forwarding does work with this connection anymore.
    88
    99Currently the code doesn't build on Windows, but it should be easily fixable by including the proper headers. Also non-primary connection modes (direct connection, STUN enabled host with non-STUN client and vice versa etc.) may have some easily noticeable/fixable bugs. And the code still requires some style fixes (in particular part of those reported by elexis in comment:25)