Changes between Version 221 and Version 222 of AndroidPort


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Feb 9, 2012, 9:29:37 PM (12 years ago)
Author:
Anders Feder
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • AndroidPort

    v221 v222  
    130130
    131131 * ''[http://code.google.com/p/nvidia-texture-tools/ NVTT]'' - We don't need any of its fancy features like CUDA support or image-loading tools, just the basic CPU-only compression library, so it should be buildable with no significant external dependencies (though its build system might need fixing).
    132  * ''Spidermonkey'' - Presumably, Spidermonkey has been ported as part of [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Fennec/Android Fennec]. We can't use Android's native V8 engine since we rely on some complex API features, so porting would be a huge amount of work. !SpiderMonkey isn't API-compatible or behaviour-compatible across versions, so it'd be best to use the same [https://developer.mozilla.org/en/SpiderMonkey/1.8.5 1.8.5] release as we use on PCs if possible; I think the standard releases are meant to work on ARM, so that should be okay.
     132 * ''Spidermonkey'' - Spidermonkey has been ported as part of [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Mobile/Fennec/Android Fennec]. We can't use Android's native V8 engine since we rely on some complex API features, so porting would be a huge amount of work. !SpiderMonkey isn't API-compatible or behaviour-compatible across versions, so it'd be best to use the same [https://developer.mozilla.org/en/SpiderMonkey/1.8.5 1.8.5] release as we use on PCs if possible; I think the standard releases are meant to work on ARM, so that should be okay.
    133133 * ''Enet'' - Compiles natively against the NDK.
    134134 * ''FCollada'' - We use a customised/bugfixed version of FCollada, so a port of the standard version of FCollada probably wouldn't work. Our own version has no significant dependencies other than libxml2.