Opened 2 years ago

Last modified 22 months ago

#6560 closed defect

Han barracks/ stable champions tech — at Version 5

Reported by: Langbart Owned by:
Priority: Should Have Milestone: Alpha 26
Component: Simulation Keywords:
Cc: Patch:

Description (last modified by Langbart)

[26632] and [26633] have added two technologies that are only available in captured barracks/stables of non-Han civilisations.

issue

The info can not be accessed from the structure tree.

possible solution

The Han are by far the most unique civilisation, they can lose this technology or give it to them normally so it shows up in the structure tree.

related thread

  1. Fixing Chinese Han (11/Mar/22)

Player of 0AD

If you conquer barracks or stables of another civ, you can train champions there. Must be a bug, it's too OP.

  1. Alpha 26 Pre-release/Release Candidate Build Testing (14/Jun/22)

Gurken Khan

I can't produce one specific unit there.

Change History (7)

by Langbart, 2 years ago

Attachment: tech_en_han.jpg added

by Langbart, 2 years ago

Attachment: struct_han.jpg added

comment:1 by wowgetoffyourcellphone, 2 years ago

It was thought to be underpowered to not allow the Han to train their champs from a captured barracks. That's why we went through the trouble of making it so it was possible. Other civs can train their champs from a captured barracks, right? 

in reply to:  description comment:2 by Langbart, 2 years ago

The structure tree is not able to accurately represent your idea. If the assumptions of an underpowered "Han" civilisation are correct, then allow to train champions after you have researched the technology normally.

comment:3 by wowgetoffyourcellphone, 2 years ago

It's a tech for a special case, not a standard tech researched from a Han building, hence would not show up in structree. (Though, I'd like structree to be extended to include such cases; Delenda Est has such a tech for Philip II called "Hegemon" that is researched from a captured Civic Center)

Last edited 2 years ago by wowgetoffyourcellphone (previous) (diff)

comment:4 by Langbart, 2 years ago

ok, if the function works, it can be implemented. At the moment it needs to be reworked.

comment:5 by Langbart, 2 years ago

Description: modified (diff)

Adding a forum thread with more related issues

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.