63 | | Furthermore, there should be a bijection between descriptions and classes. E.g. if a technology affects the `Citizen` class, write "Citizens"; if it affects the `Soldier` class, write "Soldiers"; if it affects only units that have both the `Citizen` and the `Soldier` class, write "Citizen Soldiers"; however, if it affects the `CitizenSoldier` class instead, then write "Citizen-Soldiers". (However, this should typically not occur: `Citizen` and `Soldier` are visible classes, `CitizenSoldier` is not.) |
| 63 | Furthermore, there should be a bijection between descriptions and classes. E.g. if a technology affects the `Citizen` class, write "Citizens"; if it affects the `Soldier` class, write "Soldiers"; if it affects only units that have both the `Citizen` and the `Soldier` class, write "Citizen Soldiers"; however, if it affects the `CitizenSoldier` class instead, then write "Citizen-Soldiers". (However, this should typically not occur: `Citizen` and `Soldier` are visible classes, `CitizenSoldier` is a non-visible class.) |